This market-leading Dutch IP boutique maintains a stronger presence in national patent cases than most competitors. This stems from its deep involvement in pharmaceutical and biotech disputes, which are more frequently litigated before national courts than at the UPC. Regular instructions come from generic and biosimilar drug manufacturers such as Sandoz and Accord. However, notable new instructions have recently arrived from Halozyme regarding cancer drug Keytruda and Novo Nordisk concerning semaglutide. Partner Daan de Lange also persuaded...
Full Analysis
The market-leading Dutch patent litigation team at IP boutique Hoyng ROKH Monegier continues to impress competitors and clients with its retention of high-profile cases across a broad technical spectrum. “Good quality work; we worked with a number of their patent attorneys and lawyers," a client says.
The boutique also boasts a strong patent attorney team running an impressive patent prosecution practice. Hoyng ROKH's patent attorneys are highly experienced in litigation. Up-and-coming Andrew Lin, for example, is involved in various U...
The Dutch patent practice of this international firm has undergone a fundamental transformation. In less than two years, the team led by partner Wim Maas has closed the gap to the market-leading practices in the Netherlands. This is thanks to its substantial presence in UPC cases for core clients such as Abbott, Ericsson and Pfizer, as well as high-profile instructions in national proceedings for Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis or Fresenius Kabi.
However, it was not only significant investment in new cases that gave the team a strong boost. F...
Full Analysis
After a successful generational transition in recent years, the team led by younger partners Tjibbe Douma, Peter van Gemert and Carlos van Staveren has once again closed the gap on the market leaders Brinkhof and Hoyng ROKH Monegier considerably. This stems from substantial involvement in proceedings before the UPC local division The Hague, as well as in national litigation.
A notable new instruction saw the team representing Broadcom against Netflix at the District Court The Hague. The team also remains active for key clients KPN and...
Full Analysis
The eminent Dutch patent practice at this international full-service firm remains a clear challenger to the market leaders. When it comes to representing originator drug manufacturers before the Dutch patent courts, Freshfields' Amsterdam team is even leading the market alongside Hoyng ROKH Monegier and Hogan Lovells.
The Amsterdam team works in the life sciences sector for long-standing client Novartis on several blockbuster drugs simultaneously. The team successfully represented Novartis on appeal against Synthon concerning heart fa...
Full Analysis
With a particularly strong presence in life sciences cases, Hogan Lovells' Amsterdam patent team remains among the most active patent litigation practices in the Netherlands. Due to its strength in pharmaceutical and biotech matters, the team currently handles national cases more frequently than other Dutch teams, which have shifted significantly towards UPC work. Following its highly successful campaign for Bristol-Myers Squibb concerning Factor XA inhibitor Eliquis/apixaban, Hogan Lovells now represents Merck Sharp & Dohme in another major...
Full Analysis
The patent litigation practice at international firm Pinsent Masons has historically maintained strength in life sciences, and this remains true of the Amsterdam team under partner Judith Krens. The team continues to serve its core clientele of generic and biosimilar drug manufacturers, including long-standing clients Accord and Teva. The latter's dispute with Bristol-Myers Squibb over apixaban recently settled. A notable instruction comes from Organon in a high-value, multi-jurisdictional patent dispute concerning blockbuster product Perjet...
Full Analysis
The well-established patent litigation team at this national full-service firm has consolidated its position in the Dutch market over the past two years. Under the leadership of partner Jaap Bremer, the team has not only secured a victory for core client Viatris but has also attracted a significant new client in a cutting-edge technology. The firm now represents South Korean biotech company ToolGen in the high-profile international dispute against Vertex and Lonza concerning CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technology before Dutch courts.
Via...
Full Analysis
The patent litigation team at this Dutch full-service firm remains visible in the Dutch market. Although soft IP, M&A transactions and pre-litigation advice to the firm's long-standing clients occupy a significant portion of the team's work, it regularly appears in Dutch court proceedings. Recent prominent cases include work for Sonos and GSK. The representation of the pharmaceutical originator GSK — a focus of the practice — also encompassed UPC matters.
The patent team benefits from the considerable international reputation of lead ...
Full Analysis
Since the arrival of renowned patent litigator Marleen van den Horst in 2023, this Dutch full-service firm has consolidated its position as a visible player in the Dutch patent litigation market. The team, which has grown to six litigators, continues to focus on the life sciences sector, representing a strong base of generic and biosimilar drug manufacturers. This is evident in its work for clients such as Krka against Novartis, and for STADA and INSUD over thrombosis drug Xarelto. Although most of these cases recently settled, the team cont...
Full Analysis
The Amsterdam team at this international full-service firm remains active in national patent cases across a broad technical spectrum. The team's work, led by partner Oscar Lamme, spans life sciences disputes – such as the recent case for key client Samsung Bioepis against Janssen – through to computer and IT technology matters, including the case for NST concerning chip technology. A particular highlight for the Amsterdam team in national proceedings was its work for Simmons & Simmons' long-standing client Honeywell in a licensing dispute ov...
Full Analysis
The departure of partner Arvid van Oorschot has not diminished the visibility of this well-regarded Amsterdam-based patent litigation team. Instead, it has allowed the team around the two remaining partners, Otto Swens and Ricardo Dijkstra, to position itself more efficiently in the declining market for Dutch patent litigation. The increasing use of AI tools also helped the team to strengthen its offering. With this the firm remains highly visible in national pharma cases for key clients like Teva and Boehringer Ingelheim. Sandoz is another ...
Full Analysis
At this Dutch mixed IP firm, patent attorneys make up the majority of fee earners. However, Arnold & Siedsma also stands out for its small but nimble team of lawyers who are highly active for predominantly Dutch SMEs at national courts across a broad range of technologies. Current examples include work for OneWay Plastics concerning patisserie piping bags, and Blister Partners regarding drug packaging technology. The firm consistently handles these cases with mixed teams of its own lawyers and patent attorneys. The legal team also supports W...
The Dutch CMS branch had previously maintained a low profile in patent litigation, being recognised primarily as a general IP practice. However, it has been significantly strengthened by the arrival of a four-strong team of lawyers from NautaDutilh. The team is led by Jeroen Boelens, who joined as a partner in late 2025. Featured in JUVE Patent's Ones to Watch in 2023, he brings broad patent litigation experience with a focus on pharmaceutical disputes. The team brought some work from its previous firm – including for clients such as NX Filt...
Full AnalysisThis ranking depicts the most important Dutch patent firms according to their reputation in the eight most important fields of technology in patent filing. It includes information on their most significant clients, offices and team size. Clients have been sourced from either the law firm or the EPO register. Practice strength refers to only Dutch and European patent attorneys working on patent filing and oppositions. The selection of law firms reflects the research of the editorial staff at JUVE Patent and is based on interviews with clients, lawyers and academics worldwide. It remains a subjective view and implies no disparagement of any firm not mentioned here but which is nevertheless active in these fields. The firms are alphabetically listed. To find out more about our rankings and research criteria please click here and here.
Published 6 October 2026
You are currently viewing a placeholder content from Facebook. To access the actual content, click the button below. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.
More InformationYou are currently viewing a placeholder content from Instagram. To access the actual content, click the button below. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.
More InformationYou are currently viewing a placeholder content from X. To access the actual content, click the button below. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.
More Information