JUVE Patent

Firm & Expert Profiles

Sponsored
Wildanger
  • Patents
  • Utility Models
  • FRAND Licensing
  • Employee Inventions
  • Trademarks
  • All practice areas
Sponsored
COHAUSZ & FLORACK
  • Intellectual Property
Sponsored
Grünecker
  • Patent Law
  • Utility Models
  • Employee Inventions
  • Trademark Law
  • Design Law
  • All practice areas
Sponsored
WALLINGER RICKER SCHLOTTER TOSTMANN
  • Mechanical engineering
  • Chemistry
  • Electrical engineering, electronics, and semiconductors
  • Physics
  • Green technologies
  • All practice areas
Sponsored
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
  • Intellectual Property
  • Patent Litigation
  • Trade Mark Law
  • FRAND Valuation & Litigation
  • Trade Secret Litigation
  • All practice areas
Sponsored
Boult Wade Tennant
Sponsored
PENTARC Rechtsanwälte PartG mbB
  • Patent & IP Litigation
  • IP Contracts & Licenses
  • IP Strategy
  • IP Related Arbitration
Sponsored
BARDEHLE PAGENBERG
  • Intellectual Property
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Designs
  • Unfair Competition Law
Sponsored
KATHER AUGENSTEIN
  • Intellectual Property
  • Patent Litigation
  • Trademarks
  • Design
Sponsored
Thum&Partner
  • Patent and soft IP prosecution
  • Opposition proceedings
  • Nullity actions
  • Patent litigation
  • Trademarks
  • All practice areas
Legal news ticker in cooperation with GRUR

The Editors’ Choice – EPO (BoA), Borealis Technology Oy/The Dow Chemical Company

The Board of Appeal’s decision highlights the relevance of procedural principles. One of these principles is the power of the boards to review procedural decisions of the first instance. Another principle relates to the parties’ opportunities to present their case in inter partes proceedings. Aspects…

The latest news from Legal news ticker in cooperation with GRUR: View all