Automatic injunction

Patent law reform: Bundestag introduces principle of proportionality

After months of deliberation, the German Bundestag has finally decided on amendments to a new federal government patent law. It will introduce a proportionality test for the right to an injunction under patent law. The decision comes just a few months before Germany elects a new parliament, and a new government.

11 June 2021 by Konstanze Richter

German Bundestag, patent law Germany's parliament, the Bundestag, has voted in its decision on the country's new patent modernisation law ©katatonia/ADOBE STOCK

Following an overnight session, the German parliament (Bundestag) adopted reforms to its patent law early this morning. Core to the amendments are specifications on the provision of the automatic injunction. This always follows in German patent proceedings, if the court rules on a patent infringement.

The reform enables courts to apply the principle of proportionality in cases where injunctive relief would represent a disproportionate hardship to an alleged infringer or third parties. It also makes provisions to substitute compensatory payments for injunctive relief, instead of courts automatically handing out injunctions.

Thus, an express reference to the requirements of good faith now supplements section 139, sentence 3 of the German Patent Law. Judges must therefore also take into account the legitimate interests of the patent owner when assessing whether there is unjustified hardship precluding the right to injunctive relief.

Bundestag retains the reasonable

In sentence 4 on the patent owner’s claim for compensation, in the event that the injunctive relief is limited by way of exception, the law retains the word “reasonable” in the wording of the standard.

In determining the amount of the compensation claim, the court must account for the infringed party’s patent right being limited by the restriction of the injunctive relief. A patent infringer would then have to pay at least the amount that would be reasonable in the case of a contractual agreement.

In individual cases, the compensation may also be higher. For example, if an infringer fails to examine the patent situation with due care in advance.

Patent law takes stance against trolls

However, the law puts a stop to the use of injunctive relief by patent trolls. Previously, such trolls or NPEs used the injunctive relief to stop production. Market participants approve this measure.

Katerina Vojtechova, spokesperson litigation communications at Volkswagen Group, told JUVE Patent, “With the proportionality test for injunctive relief introduced by the Patent Modernisation Act, the legislature has sent a clear signal against patent trolls. The German government and the Bundestag have reached the necessary compromise with the modernisation. The reform is an important step for a fair and less abuse-prone patent law in Germany.”

Ludwig von Reiche, chair of the German group within European trade group IP2Innovate, says, “We also welcome the German parliament’s diligent effort in the context of the new law to explicitly proscribe the practice of patent assertion entities (also known as patent trolls) who acquire patents purely for the purpose of extorting excessive settlements under the threat of an impending injunction.”

Reform in line with EU

The reform brings Germany’s patent code more into line with applicable EU law. In particular, the reform better aligns with the Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement Directive. This calls for courts to apply the principle of proportionality to patent disputes.

The reform also advocates for better synchronisation of infringement and nullity proceedings. The Federal Patent Court, which is responsible for nullity proceedings, is to be better equipped in terms of structure and personnel. This is to give the infringement judges a preliminary opinion on the validity of a patent at issue after six months.

Background to the debate

On 27 January 2021, the German Bundestag first debated the Patent Modernisation Act. Among other things, the German patent law amendment is intended to better synchronise patent infringement and nullity proceedings. However, over the past two years, a possible weakening of the automatic injunction has caused excitement for technology companies and the legal industry.

In February, an alliance of technology companies, industry associations and research institutions publicly responded to the proposed amendments. The group, which comprised 3M, BASF, Bayer, Ericsson, Nokia, Qualcomm, Panasonic and Siemens, the German Chemical Industry Association, the Association of Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies, IP Europe and the Fraunhofer Gesellschaft, opposed the government’s plans.

The alliance feared further restriction of the right to injunctive relief for patent holders and a weakening of the German patent system. According to the letter, the companies are concerned about maintaining Germany as a strong research location. They also wish to minimise any potential disruption to what they see as its well-balanced patent system.

Many experts consider the highly-experienced German patent judges and the automatic injunction imperative behind patent owners suing in Germany. (Co-authors: Amy Sandys and Mathieu Klos)