23 patent attorneys
Patent filing for Airbus, Andrew Wireless Systems, CommScope, CooperVision, Nike Innovate (all public knowledge).
London, Bath, Cardiff
54 patent attorneys
Patent filing for Accenture Global Solutions, Astellas, Boeing, CanBas, Dow Global Technologies, Jeol, ServiceNow, Sumitomo Electric Hardmetal (all public knowledge).
London, Cambridge, Oxford, Reading
71 patent attorneys
Patent filing and oppositions for Gilead, Incyte, Johnson & Johnson, Vertex. Patent filing for Biosense Webster, DePuy, Ethicon, Micron, Stanford University. EPO oppositions for Novartis, Align Technologies; Eli Lilly over Foresto key patent; Takeda over Entyvio antibody, Stanford University over phagocytic anti-CD47 antibody; Highview Power on FTO and opposition over energy storage technology; Regeneron against Amgen over chronic eczema drug dupilumab and over cholesterol-lowering drug Repatha.
45 patent attorneys
Patent filing for Goodrich Actuation Systems, Hamilton Sundstrand, Otis Elevator, Pratt & Whitney, Rosemount Aerospace, United Technologies, Xiaomi Mobile (all public knowledge).
London, Brighton, Manchester, Oxford
44 patent attorneys
Patent filing for Amazon, Amgen, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health, Dana-Faber Cancer Institute, Juniper Networks, Lubrizol, Sony, Takeda. EPO oppositions for Netflix, Corvidian, First Solar (all public knowledge).
52 patent attorneys
Prosecution: Patent filing and oppositions for Airbus Operations and Hewlett Packard. Patent filing for Arm, BAT, Flirtey, Siemens Healthcare, Sonos, Visa.
London, Bath, Cardiff, Leeds
38 patent attorneys
Patent filing for Blackberry, Cern, Huawei, JT International, Mastercard, Micron, Palo Alto Research Center, St. Jude Medical, Xerox. EPO oppositions for Mylan (all public knowledge).
70 patent attorneys
Patent filing for Baidu, Brother, I-Mab Biopharma, Regeneron, Ricoh, Oxford University Innovation, Toyota, Trek Bicycles. EPO oppositions for Pioneer. (all public knowledge).
London, Cambridge, Oxford
53 patent attorneys
Patent filing at the EPO for Amgen, Boing, Cisco, Dana Faber Cancer Institute, Dropbox, General Electric, Google, Honeywell, Janssen Sciences Quantius Technologies, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, The Regents of the University of California, Vertex Pharmaceuticals (all public knowledge).
111 patent attorneys
Patent filing at the EPO for ABB, Amazon, Bridgestone, Google, Ricoh, Samsung, Saudi Arabian Oil Company, TTI Ltd. (all public knowledge).
London, Aberdeen, Birmingham, Cambridge, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Manchester, Oxford,
59 patent attorneys
Patent filing Abbott, Abbvie, British Petrol, 3M, Cisco, Cook Medical Technologies, Genzyme, Intuitive Surgical Operations, NEC, Swisscom, 3M (all public knowledge).
London, Cambridge, Manchester, York
62 patent attorneys
Patent filing for 10X Genomics, Danisco, Genentech, Hitachi, Regeneron, Shimadzu, Shin-Etsu Chemical (all public knowledge).
London, Bristol, Cambridge, Manchester
20 patent attorneys
Patent filing for Conversant, Nokia, Schneider Electric, Vestel (all public knowledge).
40 patent attorneys
Patent filing for Baxter, Boe Technology, Chevron Phillips Chemical, Here Global, Mexichem Fluor, Nokia, Zoll Medical. EPO oppositions for AstraZeneca and BT (all public knowledge)
76 patent attorneys
Patent filing for Biomet, British American Tabacco, Google, MediaTek, Palantir Technologies, Regeneron, Samsung, Sanofi Aventis (all public knowledge), Airbus Defence and Space, Cycle Pharmaceutical, Clinigen, Nokia. EPO oppositions for Proctor & Gamble, Airbus Defence and Space concerning Boeing’s signal processing technology; Epizyme against GSK over EZH2 patent.
Cambridge, London, Manchester, Guildford
8 patent attorneys
Patent filing for Alibaba, Palantir Technologies, Qualcomm, United States Postal Service, University of Washington (all public knowledge).
Please note: From 2019 JUVE Patent shall list the most important patent firms in the four main
European jurisdictions. These shall be selected according to their reputation in the eight most
important fields of technology in patent filing. The list shall include information on their most
significant offices, team size and important clients. The selection of law firms in the above table
reflects the research of the editorial staff at JUVE Patent and is based on interviews with clients,
lawyers and academics worldwide. It remains a subjective view and implies no disparagement of any
firm not mentioned here but which is nevertheless active in this field. The firms are alphabetically
Practice Strength: Only national and European patent attorneys working on patent filings and oppositions
Significant Clients: Source: information provided by the law firm or EPO register.