18 patent attorneys
EPO opposition: CMC Holding. Patent filing: BE Aerospace, Rockwell Collins, Koito Manufacturing, AA-Lux, VDL Hapor, University of Maastricht (all public knowledge).
Eindhoven, The Hague, Amsterdam, Arnhem
23 patent attorneys
Patent filing: Bio Materials, Boing, Samsung Electronics, Illumina, Opto Electronics (all public knowledge).
Amsterdam, The Hague, Breda, Endscgede, Eindhoven, Leeuwaden, Nijmegen
16 patent attorneys (including one dual qualified as a lawyer)
Patent filing and oppositions: Inalfa Roof Systems, Mylaps, Nouryon Chemicals, OuTech, Purac Biochemie, Signify. Patent filing: KPN, Promaton Holding, Shin-Etsu Chemical, Unilin, Universities of Amsterdam, Arnheim and Delft (all public knowledge).
Amsterdam, Arnheim, Eindhoven
23 patent attorneys
Patent filing and oppositions: Euro-caps, Furanix Technologies, Upfield Europe. Oppositions: Tencent Technology, Dana-Faber Cancer Institute. Patent filing: Heerema Marine, Itrec, Vale, Voltea, ZTE, Technical University of Delft (all public knowledge).
Rijswijk, Amsterdam, Utrecht
16 patent attorneys
Patent filing and oppositions: DSM Nutrition, Hologic, Lely, Pinlock, Seaborough, Tessenderlo.
34 patent attorneys
Patent filing and oppositions: Samsung Electronics. Patent filing: Allergan, Baidu, Carbion Biotech, Delta Electronics, Imec, Novo Nordisk, N.V. Nutricia (all public knowledge).
The Hague, Amsterdam, Eindhoven, Ede
11 patent attorneys
EPO opposition for Coenegrachts Substraat. Patent filing for Cup Out Of The Box, I4F Licensing, KCC Coorparation, Koppert, Radie, The Antenna Company (all public knowledge).
38 patent attorneys
Patent filing and oppositions: Comcast Cable Communications, Prolynx, Dynamic Logic. Patent filing: Dow Global Technologies, DSM, Hitachi, Koninklijke Douwe Egberts, Neopost Technologies, Shin-Etsu Chemical, Solaredge, Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (all public knowledge).
The Hague, Amsterdam, Arnhem, Eindhoven, Utrecht, Groningen
Please note: This ranking depicts the most important Dutch patent firms according to their
reputation in the eight most important fields of technology in patent filing, including information
on their most significant offices, team size and important clients. The selection of law firms in
the above table reflects the research of the editorial staff at JUVE Patent and is based on
interviews with clients, lawyers and academics worldwide. It remains a subjective view and implies
no disparagement of any firm not mentioned here but which is nevertheless active in this field. The
firms are alphabetically listed.
Practice Strength: Only Dutch and European patent attorneys working on patent filings and oppositions
Significant Clients: Source: information provided by the law firm or EPO register.