24 patent attorneys
Patent filing: Additive Industries, B/E Aerospace, Engie, Ericsson, Koito Manufacturing, Lumicks, Marel Group, Ncardia, Nexperia, Oncode, OncoSignal, Prysmian, Philips Group, Rockwell Collins, Sabic, Signify, Tespra, technical universities of Eindhoven and Delft, University of Maastricht, Vanderlande, VDL Group. EPO oppositions for Engie, Scenic Biotech, Synthon (some public knowledge).
Eindhoven, Arnhem, Rijswijk, Maastricht, Utrecht, Sittard-Geleen
32 patent attorneys
Patent filing for Boeing, Kawasaki, Littelfuse, Rijk Zwaan, Samsung Electronics, Trina Solar, Vito. Oppositions: etherna Immunotherapies against Moderna in EPO opposition over mRNA patent; frequent EPO oppositions for Kawasaki (some public knowledge).
Amsterdam, The Hague, Breda, Enschede, Eindhoven, Leeuwarden, Nijmegen
19 patent attorneys
Patent filing and oppositions for Corbion, Inalfa Roof Systems, OuTech, Plantics, Purac Biochem, Signify. Patent filing: Damen 40, Fast & Fluid Management, Flexous, Flooring Industries Limited, MyLaps, NTRC, Koninklijke Gazelle, KPN, Lead Pharma, Pascal, Promaton, Q*Bird, Qblogs, Orange Quantum, Shin-Etsu Chemical, universities of Amsterdam, Arnhem, Delft and Maastricht (some public knowledge). Oppositions: KPN against Xiaomi in EPO opposition over SEPs.
Amsterdam, Arnhem, Breda, Eindhoven
34 patent attorneys
Patent filing and oppositions: Heerema Marine, Itrec, Nutreco, Robert Bosch, SIG Services, Spinn Coffee, Tenaris, Tembo Group, Savaria, University of Utrecht, Upfield, Technical University of Delft, Weener Plastics, Van Walraven Holding, VU Amsterdam (some public knowledge). Oppositions: YTI against Philip Morris over cigarette technology; Marchel Further Processing against GEA Food and Bakel over machine for food production. Litigation: OrthoApnea against Jozef Nelissen in UPC case over medical devices.
Rijswijk, Amsterdam, Utrecht, Sittard
15 patent attorneys
Patent filing and oppositions for Adjuvo/Seseglove, Allnex Resins, Biond, DSM Nutritional Products, Fine Agrochemicals, Gillette, Hologic, Ingredion, ISO Group, Lincoln Group, Mourik, Mutech, Orbisk, Pinlock, Quantware, Seaborough, Secrid, Tessenderlo Group (some public knowledge)
Amsterdam
41 patent attorneys
Patent filing and oppositions for N.V. Nutricia/Danone, Essity, Gadeta, Heineken, Keygene, New Amsterdam Pharma, Samsung Electronics, Synaffix/Lonza, Sapreme Technologies, Tessenderlo, TNO, Unilever and UniQure. Filing for AstraZeneca Baidu, Carbon Upcycling Technologies, Delta Electronics, Novo Nordisk, Tencent, Those Vegan Cowboys and Volvo. EPO oppositions: Xiaomi against KPN regarding multimedia streaming patent; TenCate Grass in EPO opposition over synthetic fibre (some public knowledge).
The Hague, Eindhoven, Ede
8 patent attorneys
Patent filing for Akkolens, BE Semiconductor Industry; Champion Link, Esdec, Hyet Holding, I4F Licensing, Koppert, Marel, Morphotonics; The Antenna Company (all public knowledge).
’s-Hertogenbosch
50 patent attorneys
Patent filing and oppositions: Comcast Cable Communications. Patent filing: AB Mauri, ADR Technologies, Classified Cycling, Covestro, Danone, Dow Global Technologies, DSM, Harvard College, Heineken, Innocore, Jacobs Douwe Egberts, MCi Flextronics, Nedap, Nissan Chemical, PTC Pharmaceutics, SeraNovo, TNO. Oppositions: Avebe against KMC & Ingredion in EPO opposition regarding a patent for vegan cheese analogue; Avebe against Nestlé in EPO opposition over composition of milk for allergy sufferers; Heineken against competitors in EPO oppositions over mash filter membrane; MCi Flextronics in EPO oppositions over car mirror actuators (some public knowledge).
The Hague, Amsterdam, Arnhem, Eindhoven, Groningen, Utrecht
This ranking depicts the most important Dutch patent firms according to their reputation in the eight most important fields of technology in patent filing. It includes information on their most significant clients, offices and team size. Clients have been sourced from either the law firm or the EPO register. Practice strength refers to only Dutch and European patent attorneys working on patent filing and oppositions. The selection of law firms reflects the research of the editorial staff at JUVE Patent and is based on interviews with clients, lawyers and academics worldwide. It remains a subjective view and implies no disparagement of any firm not mentioned here but which is nevertheless active in these fields. The firms are alphabetically listed. Valid: Sep 2024. To find out more about our rankings and research criteria please here and here.
We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential, while others help us to improve this website and your experience. If you are under 16 and wish to give consent to optional services, you must ask your legal guardians for permission. We use cookies and other technologies on our website. Some of them are essential, while others help us to improve this website and your experience. Personal data may be processed (e.g. IP addresses), for example for personalized ads and content or ad and content measurement. You can find more information about the use of your data in our privacy policy. You can revoke or adjust your selection at any time under Settings.
If you are under 16 and wish to give consent to optional services, you must ask your legal guardians for permission. We use cookies and other technologies on our website. Some of them are essential, while others help us to improve this website and your experience. Personal data may be processed (e.g. IP addresses), for example for personalized ads and content or ad and content measurement. You can find more information about the use of your data in our privacy policy. Here you will find an overview of all cookies used. You can give your consent to whole categories or display further information and select certain cookies.