Car infotainment

OMAP processors settlement clears way for German car manufacturers

A global patent dispute between Innovative Foundry Technologies, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company and United Microelectronics Corporation, has ended in a settlement. This will come as a relief to VW and Ford, which intend to install infotainment modules containing the disputed chips in their car models.

13 November 2019 by Mathieu Klos

The settling of a global dispute over OMAP processors is a positive for VW and Ford's infotainment systems ©Stanisic Vladimir/ADOBE STOCK

For a long time, it was unclear what non-practising entity Innovative Foundry Technologies (IFT) aimed to achieve in the patent dispute over OMAP processors. Last December, the US company initially chose to file a lawsuit against VW and Ford, and their supplier Texas Instrument. The case was filed at the Düsseldorf Regional Court, for infringement of the German patent DE 11 2004 002 401 B4.

Concurrently, IFT took action in China against telecommunication company Cisco. This was related to a Chinese patent. A short time later, IFT also filled lawsuits against TSMC in the US. Finally, in August IFT filed a suit against United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) in Germany. The dispute was over Open Multimedia Applications Platform (OMAP) processors.

Main target

Primarily, according to a recent IFT press release, the chip manufacturers were the intended targets of the lawsuits – and not the German automotive industry.

Accordingly, the two chip manufacturers TSMC and UMC have agreed with IFT to settle their patent claims over OMAP processors worldwide. However, JUVE Patent does not know any further details of the settlement.

Thomas Adam, Peterreins Schley, OMAP processors

Thomas Adam

It is reported that Texas Instruments was significantly involved in the settlement of the dispute. The real issue in the German proceedings was the OMAP processors of UMC. The Taiwanese company had manufactured these for Texas Instruments, which then ended up in the infotainment modules of car manufacturers.

IFT saw its patent infringed mainly by the processor of UMC.

However, last December – apparently to build up maximum pressure – IFT first sued VW, Ford and Texas Instruments at the Düsseldorf Regional Court (case ID: 4a O 127/18).

VW, Ford and Texas Instruments counterattacked at the German Federal Patent Court by claiming the patent was invalid (case ID: 4Ni44/19).

In August 2019, IFT put its cards on the table and filed a direct lawsuit against UMC in the same court. IFT accussed UMC of infringing the same patent, which describes the manufacture of certain transistors in the semiconductors. IFT also claimed infringement against UMC at the US International Trade Commission, as well as at a Chinese patent court.

However, the German suit has not yet formally served to UMC. So far, the Düsseldorf court has also not heard any of the cases.

The lawsuits against TSMC and Cisco are not directly related to the lawsuits against VW and Ford, but concern similar infringement allegations. It is unknown whether Cisco and IFT are also negotiating a settlement.

Negotiations will continue

But, according to JUVE Patent information, the settlement with UMC is not yet completely watertight. While the lawsuit against Ford has been withdrawn, VW and Texas Instruments are still negotiating details with IFT and complaints have not yet been withdrawn from either side.

Klaus Haft, Hoyng ROKG Monegier, OMAP processors

Klaus Haft

However, according to statements by those involved in the trial, this is likely to happen over the next few days.

VW is currently vehemently defending itself against lawsuits over connected cars patents, well-known among the patent community. Although VW essentially agreed a licence with Avanci this spring, the company is still negotiating 4G patent modalities with the patent pool.

Apparently VW has learnt quickly from its first wave of lawsuits, which was started in 2018 by chip manufacturer Broadcom.

The dispute ended surprisingly quickly in a settlement in late November 2018, after only two judgments in the car manufacturers’ favour.

Out of the shadows

In the dispute with Broadcom, VW was represented by Düsseldorf law firm Kather Augenstein. Krieger Mes partner Axel Verhauwen reportedly also has good contacts to Wolfsburg. Verhauwen advices VW in the dispute with IFT.

Ford has had no involvement in patent litigation in Germany for many years. Hogan Lovells came to the fore because the US car manufacturer worked closely with the law firm’s US practice in other legal fields. Additionally, partner Steffen Steininger has good contacts to the German subsidiary.

Steffen Steininger, Hogan Lovells, OMAP processors

Steffen Steininger

Texas Instruments was not directly sued in the dispute against Broadcom, but acted as co-litigant in the case. Here, Hogan Lovells also represented Texas Instruments.

However, Klaus Haft of Hoyng ROKH Monegier now advised the US chip manufacturer in the dispute with IFT. Haft has a raft of experience in mobile communications lawsuits, as well as in disputes over semiconductors. He is also a regular advisor of Intel.

IFT has not yet formally served the lawsuits against UMC. As such, the chip manufacturer has not yet appointed a law firm as a litigator. According to JUVE Patent information, however, a Munich team from Boehmert & Boehmert is active for UMC.

New owner, new advisor

The patent was originally filed by Grünecker for semiconductor company AMD, before the US chip manufacturer sold its patent to IFT in 2017. Peterreins Schley took over the mantle in 2018. The Munich firm has also filed several patents for IFT with the European Patent Office.

IFT relied on Boston law firm Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo for the US lawsuits. In China, the Beijing office of King & Wood Mallesons took the lead.

For Innovative Foundry Technologies
Peterreins Schley (Munich): Thomas Adam; Jan-Malte Schley (patent attorney)

For Texas Instruments
Hoyng ROKH Monegier (Düsseldorf): Klaus Haft; associate: Carina Höfer
Samson & Partner (Munich): Oswald Niederkofler, Robert Baier (both patent attorneys)

For VW
Krieger Mes Graf von der Groeben & Partner (Düsseldorf): Axel Verhauwen, Julia Vogtmeier
Wallinger Ricker Schlotter Tostmann (Munich): Michael Platzöder (patent attorney)
In-house (Wolfsburg): Klaus Oppermann, Ralph Jepsen, Kai Ollesky, Carsten Szymanowski

For Ford
Hogan Lovells (Munich, Düsseldorf): Steffen Steininger; counsel: Andreas Schmid (patent attorney); associate: Katharina Bickel, Cédric Rohr (patent attorney)
In-house: Joe Benz (head of patents, US), Thomas Dörfler (head of patents, Germany), Markus Markowitz (patent counsel, both Cologne)

Boehmert & Boehmert (Munich): Michael Rüberg; Heinz Goddar, Stefan Schohe (both patent attorneys)

Regional Court Düsseldorf, 4a Civil Chamber
Tim Crummenerl (presiding judge)