“We don’t expect major disruption to the UPC”

JUVE Patent: What is your initial reaction to the UK’s rejection of the UPC?
Alexander Ramsay: Ever since the Brexit referendum in 2016, the Preparatory Committee was aware that something like this could happen. Therefore, the decision of the UK government does not come as a total surprise.

Can a country that has already ratified the agreement step back so easily?
There are no provisions in the UPC agreement in the case of a member state, that has ratified the agreement, dropping out. It’s therefore very likely that the UK will have to launch a procedure under the Vienna Convention on the law of treaties.

“I would have liked the UK to be part of the UPC since the system would be better with the UK in it”

What will happen to the investments already made by the UK government?
There is no indication that investments into the UPC made by the UK will be a big issue. There is no procedure to pay the investments back. We don’t expect a major disruption and we expect the UK to leave in an orderly manner.

Do the remaining countries have a plan B?
I would have liked the UK to be part of the UPC since the system would be better with the UK in it. But preparations for the UPC will continue to go ahead without the UK. And, even without the UK, the UPC will be quite a powerful alliance of signatory states. Past surveys show that the UPC will still be to the advantage of the European patent community.

Where is the previous UK division likely to go?
A section of the Central Division of the Court of First Instance was to be located in London. The UPC still has to decide to where this location will move. However, there is no rush, as we still have to wait for the decision of the German Constitutional Court.

This interview was conducted by Amy Sandys and Konstanze Richter.